Simul Surg Train Educ Issues Pract Implic 37:267–277
Kneebone R (2003) Simulation in surgical training: educational issues and practical implications. Issenberg SB, Gordon MS, Gordon DL, Safford RE, Hart IR (2001) Simulation and new learning technologies. Insel A, Carofino B, Leger R, Arciero R, Mazzocca AD (2009) The development of an objective model to assess arthroscopic performance. Am J Surg 175:482įried GM, Feldman LS (2008) Objective assessment of technical performance. N Engl J Med 356:387–396ĭerossis AM, Fried GM, Abrahamowicz M, Sigman HH, Barkun JS, Meakins JL (1998) Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills. Surg Clin North Am 90:457–473Ĭox M, Irby DM, Epstein RM (2007) Assessment in medical education. J Am Coll Surg 209(364–370):e362Ĭhoy I, Okrainec A (2010) Simulation in surgery: perfecting the practice. Br J Surg 92:778–782Ĭhipman JG, Schmitz CC (2009) Using objective structured assessment of technical skills to evaluate a basic skills simulation curriculum for first-year surgical residents. Med Teach 34:192–197īeard JD, Jolly BC, Newble DI, Thomas WEG, Donnelly J, Southgate LJ (2005) Assessing the technical skills of surgical trainees. Level of evidenceīath J, Lawrence PF (2012) Twelve tips for developing and implementing an effective surgical simulation programme. It has the added advantage of being able to be self-assessed. The Proficiency Formula has high correlation with gold standard GRS and TSC measurements when used to assess arthroscopic knot tying skills on a model. We found strong linear correlation between the Proficiency Formula and GRS and TSE (0.83 and 0.78, respectively). Participants received a mean proficiency score of 195 (140–249). Correlation between the measurement scales was tested using Spearman’s rho correlation coefficient.
Independent samples t test was used to compare the GRS, TSC and Proficiency Formula scores, between those who were passed or failed by the evaluators. Participants were video recorded performing arthroscopic knot tying and assessed on their success tying an SMC knot, pass or fail, and through three outcome tools: the Proficiency Formula, GRS and the TSC.
Surgery knot tying video how to#
MethodĪ step-by-step video tutorial was used to instruct 35 medical students on how to tie an arthroscopic Samsung Medical Center (SMC) knot secured by three half hitches. The correlation between the Proficiency Formula and gold standard pass/fail dichotomy was demonstrated, as well as with other popular evaluation tools-task-specific checklist (TSC) and global rating scale (GRS). A Proficiency Formula was introduced as an objective self-evaluation method for evaluating basic arthroscopic knot tying in a laboratory setting.
0 kommentar(er)
